 |
|
 |
Jean-Jacque
Henner Face à l'Impressionnisme, Le dernier des romantiques
Musée de la Vie Romantique, Paris
Hôtel Scheffer-Renan
June 26, 2007- January 13, 2008
Jean-Jacques Henner, Face à l'Impressionnisme, Le dernier
des romantiques,
Paris: Paris musées and Réunion des musées
nationaux, 2007. Distributed by UD-Union distribution.
164pp.
ISBN 978-2-7596-0012-0 Paris musées
ISBN 978-2-7118-5390-8 Réunion des musées nationaux
35 €uros |
 |
| |
|
| |
The recent exhibition dedicated to
the work of the academic Salon painter Jean-Jacques Henner, in Paris
at the Musée de la Vie Romantique, raised a series of issues
that are worth considering (figs 1, 2). If Henner is known at all,
it is only to a few students of nineteenth century art, and more for
his symbolist works of women with long red hair than for any other
subject. Even though he is of interest to some historians and curators
of the nineteenth century, his prolific output remains largely unknown
to the general public, and to most outside of France. Those few who
do know his work are often confronted with the issue of an overabundance
of images, the lack of a consistent aesthetic quality, and the lingering
suspicion that Henner's paintings were copied in the nineteenth century
in order to capitalize on his reputation and fame. Adding to the difficulty
of mounting an exhibition of Henner's oeuvre is that his images often
look similar, and his paintings are exceedingly dark in tone, which
complicates their accessibility to a modern audience. Even though
Henner painted during the Impressionist era, his dark canvases suggest
that they might look best under candlelight rather than under the
brilliant illumination needed to study the best Impressionist canvases. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
With these
issues clearly before us, we can agree that the organizing committee
of the Henner retrospective, led by Rodolphe Rapetti, guest curator,
has organized a show that does justice to the artist and his career.
Working with the small space available at the Musée de la Vie
Romantique, the organizers had to control the number of works that
were presented; this was most ably handled so that a picture of Henner's
approach throughout his life emerged, from his early Realist canvases
to his more personal Symbolist works. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Organized chronologically, the exhibition
started in the first room with Henner's early works done in Italy
when he received the Prix de Rome. Compositions hung in this first
gallery showed his awareness of past masters, including an early 1858
painting of Biblical themes. Similarly, he demonstrated his mastery
of landscape painting in a group of small views of Italy. After his
return to Paris in 1864, Henner produced a highly sensual nude that
critics found exciting since it was in keeping with the style of the
most progressive artists of the time, such as Gustave Courbet and
even Edouard Manet (fig. 3). The painting has a startling directness
that challenged the accepted norms of creativity. Henner believing
that to continue along this path might compromise his standing as
an academic painter, never again painted such daring figure of a female
nude. By giving this work ample room in the exhibition, thus emphasizing
its importance to visitors, the curators underlined what critics in
1869 saw as provocative. It also helped establish Henner's position
as an artist during the closing moments of the Second Empire. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Henner's early Realist work, well
examined in the show and the accompanying catalogue, focused on a
series of portraits including Joseph Tournois, 1861 and Woman
with an Umbrella from 1874 (fig. 4). The imposing demeanor of
the sitter, and directness of her gaze, made it an icon for the wealthy
middle-class; a work that suggested that Henner could have made a
name for himself as a Third Republic naturalist portraitist. But,
as the catalogue makes plain Henner did not want to follow this progressive
direction, even destroying some of his paintings of modern Parisians
(48). |
|
| |
|
| |
Instead of continuing to paint naturalist
subjects, based on the writings of Emile Zola for example, Henner
chose to take another route "wavering between pastoral and religious
painting”. The small 1871 painting l'Alsace, for example,
displays an awareness of works from the past with a deep allegorical
meaning, perhaps inspired by the imagery of Hans Holbein (fig. 5).
The women of Thann, in the Alsace region, offered this painting to
the liberal political leader, Gambetta who opposed the treaty that
officially ended the Franco-Prussian war whereby the region of Alsace-Lorraine
was given to the German Empire. With this painting Henner struck a
nerve in the French psyche; the composition became well known, and
was widely disseminated in reproduction form, throughout the country
as a symbol of the bartered region. It became an icon of the French
cry for "revenge”. A broad public seeking an iconic image
around which to grieve and identify at this moment of national lossfound
it in l'Alsace, thereby making Henner's name famous. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
While the organizers did their best
to adjust the exhibition to the limitations of space at the museum,
it became increasingly difficult for a visitor without considerable
knowledge of Henner's work, to understand how all aspects of the show
were integrated. Further into the exhibition, considerable effort
was expended to show Henner as an official painter, an artist who
received state support through purchases at the Salon. His Christ
at the Tomb (1879), a theme that Henner would reprise on many
occasions, emerged as one of his most memorable to receive such support.
Once again, the echoes of Hans Holbein are apparent, although Henner
was increasingly interested in heightening contrasts between brilliant
illumination of parts of the body and a darkly lit background in order
to increase the drama of the composition. The inclusion of drawings
in this section of the show revealed Henner as an able draughtsman,
who valued the medium as a means of recording his travels and meetings,
but also as preparatory study for a painting. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
In the large museum Salon, which
had been an artist's studio, (the romantic painter Ary Scheffer had
lived and worked here) Henner's interest in religious themes was strongly
emphasized. By hanging works from his early career next to the Saint
Sebastian of 1888, the point was made that this theme was one
of the strongest and most effective in the artist's oeuvre (fig. 6).
Henner's ability to use the technique of "claire-obscure”
linked him to his contemporary, Théodule Ribot, one of the
leading independent painters of the era. Painted during the same period,
Henner's filmy womenthe romantic beauty, lost in her own thoughtsshown
coming out of a bath, or posed next to a fountain, appealed to a wide
public and made Henner's work in this vein highly sought after and
often imitated (fig. 7). |
| |
|
|
| |
In leaving the exhibition, and after
consulting the excellent accompanying catalogue, the viewer left with
a series of impressions and questions. Henner's work defies categorization;
he was a solitary figure who, although linked with the Academy, did
his best work in solitude and away from official interference. While
he could have followed a more progressive path, aligning himself clearly
with the Realists or Symbolists, he opted to remain outside of rigid
classifications in order to preserve his ties with the Salon des Artistes
Français and with his traditional colleagues. He chose to chart
his own original course but, as a result relied too closely on references
to artists from the past, and fell into an increasingly narrow thematic
representation that hindered him from achieving greater success in
his own timeand receiving his due in the history of nineteenth-century
French art. This exhibition makes amply clear that although one can
admire Henner for trying to chart his own course in the nineteenth
century, his achievement was compromised by a failure of will or unwillingness
to take chances. Even though the exhibition may not make Henner a
revelation for our time, and ultimately enhance his reputation beyond
that of appearing as an interesting curiosity in the annals of nineteenth-century
art, we must applaud the exhibition for resurrecting the work of an
artist in the spirit of inquiry and truthfulness so that further investigation
into the rich variety of nineteenth century art can continue. We must
also applaud the highly intelligent and scholarly catalogue, which
presents a well-balanced assessment of the artist in the context of
his time as well as a study of the various phases of his career. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Gabriel P. Weisberg
University of Minnesota
Vooni1942[at]aol.com |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
© 20089 Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide
and Gabriel P. Weisberg. All Rights Reserved. |
|
|
 |
|