 |
| |
 |
Richard
Maxwell, editor
The Victorian Illustrated Book
Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 2002
448 pages; 125 b/w ills.; $45.00
ISBN 0-8139-2097-3
Index; notes
|
 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
This collection of essays addresses
an unwieldy subject: the Victorian illustrated book, which cannot
be defined exactly, in view of its multiplicity, but which nevertheless
seems to exist as an identifiable whole. An unprecedented number of
books with images was produced in England and Scotland from the 1830s
until the First World War. Books in general flourished in Victorian
Britain, of course, due to developments in mass-market publishing,
and print might well have overshadowed graphic art. But the glut of
words actually fostered illustrations due to what Richard Maxwell,
the editor of this volume, calls a "widely shared hunger for
visual stimulation" (xxv).1 Technological advances
in mechanical reproduction made illustrations more feasible and economical,
but these essays are not concerned with such practical developments.
They deal, by and large, with the relation between image and text. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
In the
opening essay, "Walter Scott, Historical Fiction, and the Genesis
of the Victorian Illustrated Book," Richard Maxwell explains
that, before Scott, "illustration" meant verbal explanationof
which Scott's own works had many. (The first edition of The Lay
of the Last Minstrel [1809] was almost one half notes.) Scott's
own prodigious output used "illustration" in a number of
senses, verbal and visual, as Maxwell explains in this substantial,
well-reasoned discussion. Ostensibly visual images were used to authenticate
points made in the text, and Scott's illustrators adopted the tradition
of antiquarian drawings for the author's sometimes complex purposes
(a notable case being the Scottish regalia). On the other hand, an
illustration might serve to destabilize the text, as in the case of
an illustration of the "Lee-penny" in the posthumous Abbotsford
edition of The Talisman. Whereas text and notes preserve a
neutral tone about whether this talisman actually possesses its reputed
powers, an illustration on the final page of a box for the Lee-penny
owned by the Empress Queen Charlotte Sophia, wife of George III, raises
issues of madness and fundamental questions about kingship; it also
connotes relics, which have their own particular kind of truth. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Steven Dillon also deals with the
suggestiveness and ambiguity of objects in "Illustrations of
Time: Watches, Dials, and Clocks in Victorian Pictures." His
inquiry into formal and iconographical implications exhibits a great
range of reference: he seems to have noticed the timepieces (usually
lost in the welter of Victorian things) in virtually every book or
periodical of this "time-conscious ‘age of historicism'"
(53). Whereas we might expect clocks to serve a regularizing function,
Dillon more often finds connotations of "genial domestic time"
in publications aimed, after all, at readers with leisure enough to
read them. Yet time also leads inevitably to death, hence a number
of instances where timepieces have dark associations. Dillon's broad
theme is handled anecdotally and comes to no definite conclusions,
as illustrated by his analysis of an unidentified "circle depending
from a ribbon around his neck" to be seen in illustrations of
Mr. Pickwick: is it a watch, an eyeglass, a medal? There is no clear
answer, and Dillon rues the literalism of the one edition that identifies
the mysterious shape. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
In "Serial Illustration and
Storytelling in David Copperfield" Robert L. Patten seeks to
demonstrate that images can be as complex and "polyvocal"
as text. Dickens's narrator is a mature man, a successful novelist,
yet he also directly represents the thoughts and feelings of his ten-year-old
self, and Patten makes much of the challenge to Hablot Knight Browne
("Phiz") in representing this complex point of view. The
essay emphasizes an illustration for the original serial titled "I
make myself known to my aunt," when David, quite desperate and
bereft of other hopes for his futurepresents himself to Betsey
Trotwood, hitherto a remote and frightening personage soon to reveal
herself as a redemptive maternal figure. This scene required Phiz
to show David as a near-beggar and yet suggest the spunk that will
allow him to succeed, also to convey Aunt Betsey's complex reactions
to him. Patten examines sketches and related images from the serial
to show how "the verbal epistemology of recollection and reconnection
is matched by a visual epistemology of blended points of view and
physical reconnections" (120). Phiz's gentle illustrations would
seem to stagger under the weight of this analysis, yet Patten does
demonstrate a strong connection between the text and these images,
which were not treated kindly by critics and omitted or replaced in
later editions. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Simon Joyce's "Maps and Metaphors:
Topographical Representation and the Sense of Place in Late-Victorian
Fiction" addresses issues raised by the use of illustrative maps
in fiction in the second half of the nineteenth century. Maps would
seem to be neutral visual duplicates of information in the text, but
Joyce uses post-structuralist theory to examine them as several different
kinds of arguments about the world. Maps can "locate" a
vanished world, as in Arthur Morrison's A Child of the Jago
(1895), where a map establishes the reality of a subculture in the
East End of London that in the course of the novel wanes and disappears.
Or a map can "locate" a fictional site, even establish routes
for literary pilgrims, as in the case of the map of Egdon Heath drawn
by Thomas Hardy himself for the first edition of The Return of
the Native (1878). (Hardy, who went so far as to emulate the style
of an ordnance survey, later admitted the map to be largely fictional.)
Maps can also "locate" adventures, as in Robert Louis Stevenson's
Treasure Island (1883) and H. Rider Haggard's King Solomon's
Mines (1886). Stevenson's tale literally developed out of a map
he drew to entertain a child, we learn, and the map is the mainspring
of the plot even if it proves to be a red herring. Joyce relates Haggard's
map (also a red herring) to sinister elements of colonialism, manifested
by its high-handed conferral of European names to African sites. Referring
to an interpretation by Anne McClintock, he suggests that the map
might even undermine the text by alludingwhen seen upside downto
"'the presence of alternative female powers and of alternative
African notions of time and knowledge.'" |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Herbert F. Tucker's essay, "Literal
Illustration in Victorian Print," is also concerned with the
tension between imagehere in the form of letters or wordsand
printed text. His topic includes decorated capitals, as seen in Punch
illustrations by John Tenniel and Richard Doyle. Amusing examples
of capitals incorporated into illustrational drawings by William Makepeace
Thackeray, who worked as an illustrator for Punch in his early
days, make Tucker's point that initial capitals are about readingin
particular, the voluntary entry of the reader into the fictive world.
Tucker also examines how handwriting figures in printed texts, from
the "illiterations" of The Pickwick Papers, where
a carved inscription mistaken for an archaeological find is rendered
in type for humorous effect, to John Ruskin's revealing use of samples
of his own handwriting in Praeterita. In a discussion of the
prosody of various Victorian poets, Tucker argues that the best illustrations
for poems provide some kind of visual analogy to the text. The most
complex issues are found in the work of William Morris, whose Kelmscott
productions show the culmination of letter as designed image. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Essays by Elizabeth K. Helsinger
and Jeffrey Skoblow continue the discussion of William Morris, who,
according to Richard Maxwell, "emerges as probably the single
most important figure in Victorian book design" (xxvii). Helsinger
deals with the early years when Morris was still casting around for
his vocation. Wishing to address issues of contemporary life and labor,
he looked to the "lesser arts" of interior design and book
arts ("the wall and the page") rather than great art, which
involved struggle and strain. Although forced in time to use machines,
Morris wanted to reproduce the "unconscious intelligence"
and sensory knowledge, and pleasure, of traditional crafts. Thus the
designs used recurrent pattern and rhythmic repetition within an overall
architectural structure, and so, Helsinger argues, did the poems.
Although such poems by Morris as The Earthly Paradise are often
dismissed as escapist, Helsinger argues persuasively that by providing
a "new way to live in Art," they were meant to coax the
modern imagination back into health and even imbue the reader (or
listener, for they were meant to be read aloud) with hope for the
future. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
In "Beyond Reading: Kelmscott
and the Modern," Jeffrey Skoblow asks how contemporary scholars
can make such an idiosyncratic and antiquarian enterprise as the Kelmscott
press new. His answer lies in looking at the books, particularly the
Chaucer, as material objects, indeed, as ritual objects. Morris is
seen to share an "Aesthetics of the Dire" with twentieth-century
theorists such as Walter Benjamin and Charles Bernstein, and like
them to be looking for a way to overcome the commodification of art.
Kelmscott restored the "aura" to books at a time when they
had become commonplace. Skoblow shows how Morris's text and images
are "fully interpenetrated" in such works as The Glittering
Plain, where everything works together: the initial capitals,
the box-within-box page design, and the opening (the two-page spread
of the open book that Morris recognized as its essential shape). Even
typeface is seen to have its own analogous "materiality."
Here is Morris's modernity: his texts are "iconic," i.e.
designed to be seen as texts, thus forcing the reader to examine the
act of reading. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Nicholas Frankel makes the same point
in "Aubrey Beardsley ‘Embroiders' the Literary Text."
Beardsley (like Morris, a fertile subject for post-structuralist analysis)
also saw the text as a fabricated thing that could interact with image
and design. His work on an edition of the Rape of the Lock
in the late 1890s included the binding, a list of illustrations, frames
for the imagesall of which draw attention to the book as a book.
The obtrusive graphic line of his drawings reminds us that they are
drawn; such aspects as the prominent stippled effect remind us that
they are to be reproduced photomechanically. Benjamin's "Painting
and the Graphic Arts" is important to Frankel's analysis of Beardsley's
style, seen in terms of a post-structuralist skirmish against the
authority of the text (and also, in the process, supporting the poem's
subtext of transgression)a provocative point of view, although
art historians might object to placing Beardsley's style in such a
postmodern vacuum, without reference to Art Nouveau, Japanese prints,
or other influences. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Similarly without art historical
context is Charles Harmon's essay "Alvin Langdon Coburn's Frontispieces
to Henry James's New York Edition: Pictures of an Institutional Imaginary."
With some ambivalence, Harmon follows postmodern critics who interpret
Henry James by means of "queer theory," loosely defined
as a sense of "otherness" from societal norms. Not surprisingly,
James opposed the very idea of illustrating his novels, but he did
in the end sanction the use of Coburn's photographs in the ambitious
New York Edition. Coburn's frontispiece to The Portrait of a Lady),
a photograph of an English country house, reflects the ambiguity of
James's text by both idealizing and de-idealizing this common symbol
for cultural prestige. It is, for Harmon, the blurriness of Coburn's
image that provides a place for this ambiguity. Neither Coburn's artistic
objectives as related to other Pictorialist photographers nor James's
own ideas about Coburn's contributions figure in Harmon's postmodern
analysis, which, of course, assumes the death of the author. Indeed,
James is seen to figure in the death of the novelistic illustration,
since he, along with Flaubert, Joyce, and others, "transformed
the image of the serious writer into a quasi-priestly wordsmith, suspicious
of icons and exclusively attuned to the displacements of the signifier"
(299). Coburn's photograph of James in profile (the frontispiece to
his first major novel, Roderick Hudson) becomes the very image
of the postmodern marginal man, with "a nameless sense of otherness"
(325). |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Katie Trumpener's essay, "City
Scenes: Commerce, Utopia, and the Birth of the Picture Book,"
returns to a more benign domestic sphere with a consideration of children's
books, common in Victorian homes by the 1830sin particular,
the children's guide to London, pioneered by Ann and Jane Taylor (members
of William Blake's circle) and continued by Thomas Crane and Ellen
Houghton, E. V. Lucas and Francis Bedford, Randolph Caldecott, and
Kate Greenaway. Trumpener's concern is largely socioeconomic in this
analysis of attitudes toward the city and the surrounding countryside,
and she focuses on social relationships and "the ethics of spectatorship,
encounter, and witness" (345). Whereas the Taylors' City Scenes
(1809) alert children to the socioeconomic injustices that lie behind
enchantments of the city such as the "sensory paradise"
of Covent Garden, later books such as Compton Mackenzie's Kensington
Rhymes (1912) eliminate moral lessons and implicitly invite their
readers to be infant flâneurs who treat the city as a spectacle
where "rich children play, poor children work" (371). London
is seen as the gateway to imaginative realms in such books as The
Town Child's Alphabet (1924) and Mary Poppins (1934). |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Richard Maxwell's afterword, "The
Destruction, Rebirth, and Apotheosis of the Victorian Illustrated
Book," demonstrates that although the tradition of the Victorian
illustrated book might seem to have died by 1913 it was through destruction
that it survived. A bellwether was What a Life! (1911), the
tongue-in-cheek biography by E. V. Lucas and George Morrow with text
parodying nineteenth-century "sensation fiction" and illustrations
cut out of a Whiteley's catalogue. Its ironic juxtaposition of word
and image, deliberate infantilism, and use of popular imagery presaged
Dada, Surrealism, and other subversive twentieth-century movements
(What a Life! was, in fact, included in the 1936 MOMA exhibition
"Fantastic Art, Dada, and Surrealism"). Maxwell considers
the further transmogrification of the tradition by Max Ernst and Joseph
Cornell, the latter who "himself sometimes seems like a figure
constructed for experimental purposes out of odd bits of Thomas De
Quincey, Emily Dickinson, and Lewis Carroll" (406). Maxwell also
discusses the curious figure of Henry Darger, a self-taught artist
who obsessively made scrapbooks and created a nineteen-thousand-word
novel about the mythic Vivian girls, illustrated with images originally
stored in loose-leaf books. (Although Darger was the subject of a
1998 exhibition at the University of Iowa Museum of Art, the text
unfortunately supplies no illustrations of his work.) The use of Victorian
books as fodder for late-twentieth century irony and self-consciousness
is seen in Tom Phillips's A Humument: A Treated Victorian Novel
(1980), which subjects the text of W. H. Mallock's 1892 novel A
Human Monument to marking out, over-writing, and random illustration.
The appearance of Victorian imagery in film, most notably Atom Egoyan's
The Sweet Hereafter (1997), further shows its enduring appeal
to the contemporary imagination. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
This collection of essays is not,
of course, comprehensive in its treatment of the subject. Whereas
Scott, Dickens, and Morris are discussed extensively, figures such
as Lewis Carroll and John Tenniel remain tangential. Art historians
may miss a more thoroughly developed art historical context for the
artists considered, particularly William Morris. On the other hand,
they may value other points of view from these writers who are, by
and large, literary scholars (a notable exception being Elizabeth
Helsinger, a professor of art history as well as English at the University
of Chicago). The subject is an important one for all scholars of the
nineteenth century. Maxwell cites the strong impact of the Victorian
illustrated book on grand narrative painting, poetry, the theater,
the writing of history, and journalism. (We are reminded that the
London Illustrated News was founded with explicit acknowledgement
of the influence of the Abbotsford edition of Scott.) Citing Pater's
dictum that "all art constantly aspires towards the condition
of music," Maxwell observes that "at one time or another,
during the nineteenth century, all the arts in Englandeven music,
when it accepted the mystique of the programyearned to achieve
the condition of illustration" (xxii). This volume goes a long
way toward elucidating the complexities of that condition. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Julie L'Enfant
Associate Professor
Department of Liberal Arts
College of Visual Arts
St. Paul, Minnesota |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
1. All references to page numbers within the text are to Maxwell,
ed., The Victorian Illustrated Book.
|
|
|
 |
|