 |
|
 |
Toulouse-Lautrec
and Montmartre
National Gallery of Art, Washington D. C., March 20- June 12, 2005
The Art Institute of Chicago, July 16-October 10, 2005 |
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
The world of nineteenth-century Montmartre
continues to lure middle- class audiences with its aura of risqué
pleasures and illicit pastimes, as the current exhibition at the Art
Institute of Chicago amply demonstrates (fig.1, 2). Toulouse-Lautrec
and Montmartre, which runs from July 16-October 10, 2005, announces
its resolutely bohemian pedigree with strains of Offenbach's Gaité
Parisienne as the visitor steps past the ticket-takers into a
dimly lit hall, where the wavering forms of yellow globe lamps gleam
dully in the shiny surface of overhead reflective panels. The visitors
too are captured unaware in the reflective surfaces, suggesting the
milling crowds of a Montmartre cabaret, as they prepare to enter the
exhibition's introductory gallery, or step aside into the small video
theatre to learn more about historical background. This liminal space
serves its function well, mediating the transition from museum galleries
to the theatrical spaces of the exhibition, and enticing visitors
with hints of café-concerts, raucous music, and probably a
little too much absinthe. Curators Douglas Druick and Gloria Groom,
together with Senior Exhibition Designer, Joseph Cochand, have created
an enticing stage set for the tragicomic excess that characterized
late nineteenth-century Montmartre. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Although
it might be argued that Montmartre itself is the star of the show,
the focal point is Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, master painter, lithographic
pioneer, and highly visible resident of that idiosyncratic and subversive
neighborhood on the edge of fin-de-siècle Paris. His popularized
biography is all too well known as the melodrama of the young aristocrat
whose unfortunate DNA, coupled with an accident in early adolescence,
resulted in physical abnormalities that led to estrangement from his
family and a desire to find his own way in the bohemian arts community
of Montmartre. While elements of this narrative are certainly accurate,
its presentation in the form of Hollywood movies and coffee table
art books has obscured the seriousness of Toulouse-Lautrec's art,
as well as minimized the significance of the environment in which
he lived and worked. The intent of Toulouse-Lautrec and Montmartre
is to bring that larger historical context to the forefront, and presumably,
to clarify the artist's position within it. To that end, the Art Institute
of Chicago and the National Gallery of Art in Washington D. C. have
assembled over 350 works by artists associated with Montmartre at
the end of the nineteenth century. Both museums have permanent collections
that are rich in work from this period, but this exhibition also includes
rarely seen ephemeral materials such as sheet music, avant-garde journals,
and puppet theatre shadow figures (fig. 3). In addition, the artists
represented are not limited to the usual suspects, but encompass such
figures as Adolphe Willette, Santiago Rusiñol, and Henri Rivière
as well as many others whose names are barely familiar to art historians,
let alone the general public. This diversity adds depth to the presentation
without abandoning the need for star artists in attracting a large
audience for the summer tourist season. More importantly, it introduces
unrecognized artists whose work legitimately deserves more study and
attention. |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
| |
| Figure
4. Installation at National Gallery of Art, Washington D. C.
showing Théophile-Alexandre Steinlen, La Rue,
1896 color lithograph on paper, mounted on canvas. National
Gallery of Canada, Ottawa. |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure
5. Installation at the Art Institute of Chicago showing the
incorporation of a clip from MGM's 1953 musical, Moulin Rouge.
Photo courtesy of the Art Institute of Chicago. |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure
6. Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, Miss Loïe Fuller,
1893 brush and spatter lithograph. National Gallery of Art,
Washington, D.C. |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure
7. Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, Miss Loïe Fuller,
1893 brush and spatter lithograph. The Baltimore Museum of Art |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure
8 Installation at National Gallery of Art, Washington D. C.
of archival film footage showing Loïe Fuller performing.
In the installation in Chicago, the lithographs are displayed
on the opposite wall from the film, thus allowing viewers to
watch Fuller in action independent of the lithographs. |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure
9. Henri de Toulouse-Lauctrec, A Corner of the Moulin de
la Galette, 1892, oil on cardboard. National Gallery of
Art, Washington D. C. |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure
10. Jules Chéret, Bal au Moulin Rouge, 1889, color
lithograph. Poster advertising the Moulin Rouge. Los Angeles
County Museum of Art |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure
11. Jean-François Rafaëlli, The Naturalist Quadrille
at the Ambassadeurs, Illustration for Paris illustré,
1 August 1886. The Jane Voorhees Zimmerli Art Museum, Turgers,
The State University of New Jersey |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure
12. Jean-Louis Forain, The Client, 1878, pencil, watercolor
and gouache. Collection of The Dixon Gallery and Gardens, Memphis,
Tennessee |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure
13. Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, Marcelle Lender Dancing the
Bolero in "Chilpéric", 1895-96, oil on
canvas. National Gallery of Art, Washington D. C. |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure
14.. Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, At the Circus: The Entry
into the Ring, 1899, black and colored pencil. The J. Paul
Getty Museum, Los Angeles |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure 15. Adolphe Willette, Parce Domine, c. 1884, oil on canvas.
Musée Carnavalet, Paris |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure
16. Henry Somm, Five Female Figures with Dog, silhouettes
for the shadow play, Le Fils de l'eunuque, 1887, zinc.
The Jane Voorhees Zimmerli Art Museum, Rutgers, The State University
of New Jersey |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure
17. Installation at the Art Institute of Chicago displaying
the work of Toulouse-Lautrec in conjunction with advertising
posters, popular publications and other ephemera associated
with the promotion of popular entertainers. Photo courtesy of
the Art Institute of Chicago. |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure
18. Anonymous, Jardin de Paris: Fêtes de Nuit-Bal,
invitation, n.d. color photorelief. The Jane Voorhees Zimmerli
Art Museum, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey |
| |
| |
 |
| |
| Figure 19. Ferdinand Misti-Mifliez,
Moulin Rouge program, 1896, color photorelief. The Jane
Voorhees Zimmerli Art Museum, Rutgers, The State University
of New Jersey |
|
|
Setting the Stage
If ever there was an opportunity to praise a curatorial team for creating
a thoughtful installation, this is it. One feature that is particularly
appealing is the use of photomurals and maps that serve a genuine
function in conveying information rather than simply providing a decorative
backdrop, as is so often the case. In the second gallery, after having
been introduced to Toulouse-Lautrec in the first gallery, the viewer
is confronted with images of Montmartre; Théophile Steinlen's
1896 color lithograph, La Rue, (fig. 4) dominates the space
with its bright colors and grand scale, but it is the massive black
& white photomural of the Moulin Rouge that offers a glimpse of
daily life in the street. Photographed from a second-floor window,
the image provides a realistic context for understanding the slightly
shabby urban neighborhood that Steinlen's figures inhabited. The nighttime
glamour of stage lights, costumes, and bright music is nowhere to
be found in the morning light when the famed dancehall appears to
be rather plain and ordinary. By placing this image right at the edge
of the opening into the next gallery, the curators have underscored
its importance, and made it virtually impossible to ignore. Similarly,
the adjacent gallery includes additional photomurals of Montmartre
locales, plus a large and excellent map that situates the viewer within
the geographical parameters of the neighborhood. As the conversations
of visitors nearby indicated, the map reminded them of places they
visited; and for those who have not had that pleasure, the map helps
to establish a sense of Montmartre's location within the city. While
the use of items such as maps and photomurals may seem peripheral,
it is nevertheless one of the few features that convey contextual
information in this age of 30-second sound bite audio-tours and minimal
wall labels. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Toulouse-Lautrec and Montmartre
must also be commended for its integration of film within the galleries
(fig.5). Rather than isolate films and videos in separate viewing
spaces, they are shown here as part of specific thematic presentations.
In the midst of the gallery devoted to dance halls, the unabashedly
Hollywood musical, Moulin Rouge (MGM, 1953) continuously screens
the scene of can-can dancers at the Moulin Rouge. Although I imagine
that the security guards may well be driven mad by the repetition
of Offenbach's music, it is nonetheless a delightful interlude in
the gallery. The film clip is mercifully short, and it captures the
light-hearted bawdiness that is popularly associated with the belle
époque. What is lacking, however, is any discussion of
how this Hollywood image relates to the reality of fin-de-siècle
Paris, or how this transformation of history into popular film changes
our understanding of the context. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Far more successful is the gallery
devoted to Loïe Fuller, the Indiana-born dancer who so fascinated
Paris in the last decade of the century. Like so many of his compatriots,
Toulouse-Lautrec was enchanted with Fuller's enigmatic performances,
in which she manipulated a series of translucent gowns while dancing
on a glass floor lit from below. Mirrors and colored lights further
enhanced the effect of an ephemeral swirl of color and shape. It isn't
surprising then, that Toulouse-Lautrec chose to depict her in a series
of color lithographs in 1893 (fig. 6, 7). Fourteen of the lithographs
are displayed around the gently curving wall of a small gallery. The
images are presented as a striking sequence of abstracted color and
movement, quite different from the artist's other lithographs and
posters of dancers and entertainers. In these small, [36.8 x 26.8
cm] rather intimate works, Toulouse-Lautrec attempted to capture the
shifting movement of color and light as Fuller's dance unfolds. The
viewer can determine the artist's success in capturing her effects
by turning towards the opposite wall and watching archival film footage
of an actual performance in progress (fig. 8). Although I would quibble
that a label indicating only that this is "archival film footage"
is simply not adequate, there is no doubt that this gallery is both
beautiful and effective. The viewer can genuinely begin to understand
Loïe Fuller's appeal, even if her colored lights and swaths of
fabric seem a bit corny by today's standards. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
One last observation on the installation
of the exhibition is that it uses light and color to guide the visitor
through the myriad themes presented. Dark green walls provide the
background for the introductory galleries, and the transition from
the theatrical entry sequence, where both Toulouse-Lautrec and the
community of Montmartre are presented to the viewer. Plum walls define
the next theme, "Places and People", (fig. 9) and give way
to blue walls in "Advertising Montmartre" (fig.10) and "Dance
Halls" (fig. 11). The gallery featuring the Chat Noir cabaret,
with its shadow theatre and reputation for outrageous behavior, is
painted a rather deep plum brown, perhaps in emulation of the smoky,
murky atmosphere of the cabaret itself. Once past this point, the
wall colors shift back to blues until reaching the gallery on the
"Maisons Closes", (fig. 12) which is again a plum brown.
This opens onto a narrow gallery with images of Marcelle Lender, the
single most "respectable" actress in Toulouse-Lautrec's
work (fig. 13). From here, the viewer steps into a more brightly lit
gallery full of circus images, painted in light tan (fig. 14). The
shift from dark to light signals that the exhibition is drawing to
a close and that the visitor must prepare to rejoin the world of twenty-first
century museum galleries. Although the use of dark wall colors is
no longer new in museum exhibitions, it is handled skillfully here
to reinforce changing moods and subjects. It is tempting to wonder
whether the curators matched the gallery colors to the wall colors
in the paintings on display, as did the curators of the 1979 exhibition,
Toulouse-Lautrec Paintings, held at this same institution. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Watching the Play
One of my first experiences at the Louvre was an overheard encounter
between an American couple in front of a Rembrandt painting. "Look
Martha! It's Rembrandt, Martha, Rembrandt." That silly phrase,
embodying the emptiness of recognizing a famous painting without understanding
why it was significant became a slogan for everything that my college
friends and I thought was shallow about American culture. Wandering
through the galleries at the Art Institute in 2005, I began to wish
that Martha and her husband had not disappeared from the cultural
landscape. Replacing them are inaudible ruminations emanating from
audio-tour headphones, as well as the constant shuffling of feet as
people stumbled into each other like slo-mo bumper cars, unaware of
their trajectory because they were focused on the sounds only they
could hear. The isolation imposed by the audio-tours, and the lack
of conversation among fellow-visitors seems a sad comment on how we
perceive exhibitions. At least Martha and her husband were talking
to each other about the art they were seeing. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Audio-tours and the ever-increasing
lack of didactic information on wall labels seem to be epidemic. This
exhibition is no different. Audio-tours encourage viewers to see the
entire exhibition in thirty to forty-five minutes. A series of thirty
entries on the tape, each of them between thirty and sixty seconds
long, means that the average viewer will get through the show in less
than an hour. The result is faster turn over, and presumably higher
ticket sales. The question is whether it also promotes a deeper understanding
of the art on display or encourages further exploration of the subject.
In short, is this tool fulfilling the educational responsibility of
the museum? In an attempt to discover at least part of the answer,
I returned to the exhibition and rented the audio-tour, an entirely
new experience for me. Admittedly, it was very pleasant to hear Satie's
music in my own personal audio world, and to stroll through galleries
with a tour guide on call. I could not complain about the information
provided, and the occasional jokes were actually funny. But I did
want more. Unlike a flesh-and-blood tour guide, you cannot ask questions
of an audio-tour guide. You get only the prescribed amount of information
and no more. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Closely tied to that question is
the role of the exhibition catalogue in contemporary shows. Today's
publications are certainly not feasible as "gallery guides",
as they seldom provide specific discussions of individual works of
art, and they are typically too cumbersome to tote around the galleries
in any case. Indeed, it would seem to make more sense to purchase
the exhibition catalogue before seeing the show so that you
can better understand the issues being presented. Although it is beyond
the scope of this review to discuss the catalogue for Toulouse-Lautrec
and Montmartre, I can say that it is lavishly illustrated and
offers some thoughtful essays by Mary Weaver Chapin, Phillip Dennis
Cate, and Richard Thomson. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The Story Unfolds
For many art historians, and more specifically for late nineteenth-century
specialists, a primary question is whether or not there is something
new herefresh insight, previously unknown information, or innovative
scholarshipbut like Montmartre itself, there will be no unadulterated
answers. There are numerous artists and works on display that are
rarely included in blockbuster exhibitions, and some of them are fully
deserving of closer attention and study. Paintings by Adolphe Willette,
for example, have long been discussed in the literature on the Chat
Noir, but they are too seldom displayed in prominent exhibitions.
This show has addressed that oversight with two works in particular:
The Virgin with Cat (The Green Virgin), 1882, and Parce
Domine, 1884 (fig. 15). Both works are openly subversive in their
content, the first because of its irreverent juxtaposition of Christian
and pagan iconography, and the second because Henry of its overt celebration
of decadentand anti-religiousattitudes and behavior. Mockery
and satire were staples of the Chat Noir, as well as other Montmartre
venues, and perhaps too edgy for many museums, even now. Likewise,
the images from the shadow puppet theatre at the Chat Noir, designed
by Somm, are seldom seen in large exhibitions (fig. 16). As one source
for the ubiquitous flat silhouettes and black outlines in late nineteenth-century
art, the significance of these shadow images cannot be underestimated. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Ephemeral material takes a significant
role in this exhibition as well. Posters and prints by Toulouse-Lautrec
are fairly standard fare, but the emphasis here is on the wide range
of material created in the late nineteenth century (fig.17). Anonymous
posters, advertising circulars, and handbills are included as well
as a rich selection of newspaper illustrations and art publications
(fig. 18, 19). The Art Institute has enriched this aspect of the exhibition
with displays elsewhere in the museum on posters, lithography (including
a lithographic press), and historical photographs of Paris. For anyone
who is deeply interested in the subject, there is a wealth of material
on display. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The most serious shortcoming of the
exhibition is that little is done to present the scholarly significance
of the content, and without the audio-tours, there is desperately
little analysis of any kind. This unwillingness to include anything
more than the most perfunctory information on wall labels has become
a pervasive problem, whether because of the perception that Americans
don't/won't/can't read or because of the demands of schedule and budget.
Still, it leaves the curious viewer unsatisfied. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
After the Show
Ultimately, any museum has to balance scholarship with public education
and budgetary realism. Toulouse-Lautrec and Montmartre offers
a beautifully installed exhibition with a wonderfully diverse selection
of art. The famous images of Montmartredance halls, café-concerts,
brothels and the streets as wellare all here in their cherished
positions; they are joined by less well-known images from the Chat
Noir and Le Mirliton, and the vast array of print-makers and advertisers
who married high art with commercial interests at the end of the nineteenth
century. Although nineteenth century specialists will no doubt prefer
more in-depth analysis, the vast majority of museum visitors will
find that this exhibition offers some intriguing new material together
with welcome familiar pieces, and a viewing experience that is both
rewarding and informative. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Special thanks to Charles Stuckey
for sharing his insights into Toulouse-Lautrec and his experience
in curating the Toulouse-Lautrec exhibition at the Art Institute of
Chicago in 1979. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Janet Whitmore
Harrington College of Design
janetwhitmore@earthlink.net |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
© 20056 Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide
and Janet Whitmore. All Rights Reserved. |
|
|
 |
|