 |
| |
 |
Nancy
E. Owen
Rookwood and the Industry of Art: Women, Culture, and Commerce,
18801913
Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 2001
335 pp.; 16 color ills.; 96 b/w ills.; bibliography, index; $49.95
(hardcover), $24.95 (paperback)
ISBN 0821413376 (hardcover); 0821413384 (paperback)
|
 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Nancy Owen's book, Rookwood
and the Industry of Art: Women, Culture, and Commerce, 18801913,
is the outgrowth of the author's doctoral dissertation written under
Hollis Clayson at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois.
Owen's text is an invaluable addition to Rookwood scholarship and
contributes to a better understanding of such fields as nineteenth-
and early twentieth-century decorative arts, material culture, gender
studies, and cultural history. As indicated in the title, the author
discusses women, culture, and commerce and the complex and often
contradictory relationship between them. While the primary focus
of her research is Rookwood Pottery, she is careful to place the
developments of this company within a larger economic, social, and
cultural context. By detailing the production methods, business
practices, wares, and personalities of this pottery manufactory,
Owen effectively offers a case study for examining this crucial
period in American history. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Owen organized
her material into seven sections: a prologue (chapter 1), five thematic
chapters (chapters 2 through 6), and an epilogue (chapter 7). In the
prologue, she outlines how the 1876 Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia
helped to catalyze the American Aesthetic movement and the American
Art Pottery movement. The Art Pottery movement, which lasted until
the outbreak of the First World War, was a concerted effort by manufacturers
and artists to elevate American pottery to a higher aesthetic level
in the eyes of the international art community. Stimulated by the
display of Japanese and European wares in Philadelphia, American manufactories
like Rookwood Pottery sought to create wares that were tasteful and
artistic. This movement was also shaped by many important cultural
developments of the period. As Owen explains, "women's roles
outside the home; anxiety about industrialization, immigration, and
urbanization; distinctions between fine art and craft; and technological
advances in communication and transportation... are enmeshed in the
American Art Pottery movement" (p. 2). |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Having provided background and an
overview of her argument, Owen's next five chapters examine Rookwood
Pottery between 1880 and 1913, the company's "golden years."
Founded in Cincinnati by Maria Longworth Nichols in 1880, Rookwood
continued to operate until 1967, although after the 1920s it ceased
to be financially solvent. William Watts Taylor, the president of
Rookwood and the figure who can be most credited with the firm's international
success, died in 1913; the National Conservation Exposition in Knoxville,
Tennessee, held in that year was the last exposition in which Rookwood
participated. After the outbreak of the First World War and the increasing
pace of modernization and industrialization in the United States,
Rookwood Pottery's production practices and wares were seen as vestiges
of an earlier century. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Chapter two, entitled "Domesticity
and Women's Labor," is perhaps the one that most directly addresses
the complex relationship between women, culture, and commerce. The
author begins by examining the Victorian cult of domesticity and how
this both promoted and hindered women's artistic aspirations. Referring
to such primary sources as John Ruskin's Sesame and Lilies
and the writings of Candace Wheeler, Owen establishes how women's
presumed domestic responsibilities influenced the type and perceived
quality of art that they produced. She argues that the masculine realm
was associated with "production, competition, and material gain,"
while the feminine realm was associated with "ideal virtues,
beauty, and consumption" (p. 16). While this chapter focuses
on the activity of women's china painting and other amateur art production,
and specifically how this played out in the early years of Rookwood
Pottery (188083), Owen revisits these associations in a later chapter
when examining female consumers. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Owen is at her best when she delves
into the specifics of the pottery firm itself. Her research is thorough
and the strength of her text lies in her ability to transform this
information into a compelling, cohesive narrative. Drawing on the
archives of the Cincinnati Art Museum, the Cincinnati Historical Society,
the Winterthur Museum and Library, and the Renwick Gallery of the
National Museum of American Art, she examined personal correspondence,
company records and publications, and advertisements to support her
thesis. She also drew heavily on contemporary accounts of the pottery,
especially those published in periodicals such as Keramic Studio
and Century. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
In chapter three, "An Ideal
Workshop," Owen again moves from the general to the specific,
beginning with the Arts and Crafts movement generally, and ending
with the situation at Rookwood. She discusses the evolution of the
English Arts and Craft movement and the subsequent development of
this style in the United States. After defining the major principles
and personalities of the English movement and examining the particular
flavor of the American Arts and Crafts movement, she then explains
the degree to which Rookwood's aesthetic sensibilities and production
methods conformed to the tenets of this movement. While Rookwood's
most celebrated lineits high-gloss, under-glazed "standard
ware" was not rendered in an Arts and Crafts style, Rookwood's
management sought to convince the public that each piece of Rookwood
pottery was hand crafted and one-of-a-kind, contrasting the firm's
wares with the impersonal, mass-produced pottery made in commercial
factories. Through photographs and letters, Owen establishes that
Rookwood sought to disassociate itself from these factories, even
going so far as to design their Tudor-style buildings to resemble
"an overgrown family dwelling in a garden" (p. 68). Of the
three main themes of the text, the third chapter moves away from gender
issues, and focuses instead on the interplay between issues of artor
cultureand commerce in the context of the American Arts and Crafts
movement. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
The reality at Rookwood,
however, did not always match the image that its management promoted.
As the decorators themselves admitted, there was considerably less
opportunity for individual expression than the public was led to believe.
Taylor was a keen businessman who carefully analyzed the salability
and profitability of different shapes and glaze lines. In most instances,
decorators were not at liberty to create their own designs. While
senior decorators would have been given more artistic freedom than
their younger, less experienced counterparts, Taylor's responsibility
was to ensure a viable and profitable company. Nevertheless, Taylor
would state that Rookwood's wares were not influenced by commercial
concerns, but were instead "authentic" and "unique"
artistic creations. In her fourth chapter, aptly entitled "An
Artist's Studio, Not a Factory," Owen outlines how and why Taylor
sought to establish Rookwood as producing "fine art." As
Owen argues, Rookwood artists who copied old master paintings or painted
tonalist landscape images onto their vases blurred the distinctions
between fine and decorative art. Rookwood also used other tactics,
such as donations to museums and a carefully crafted "Thompson
method" advertising campaign, to inform and influence public
opinion. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Chapter five, "Americanism
and the Culture of Crisis," and chapter seven, "Give the
Lady What She Wants," continue the arguments set forth in Owen's
original thesis. Chapter six returns to the "women, culture,
and commerce" dynamic by exploring how these forces informed
Rookwood's marketing and advertising. The author examines how, where,
and to whom Rookwood pottery was marketed, constructing what she calls
the "imagined [Rookwood] consumer" (p. 209). She argues
that the conservative tastes and preferences of the buyersurban,
upper or middle-class womenin turn influenced the shapes and motifs
that Rookwood produced. Owen suggests that there was a dialogue, often
facilitated by floor salesmen in the retail outlets, between the producers
and consumers of Rookwood that informed the look of the wares. As
a result of this dialogue, Rookwood's produced numerous pieces with
traditional shapes and floral motifs. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
This chapter curiously
includes a section on Rookwood's relationship to the international
art nouveau movement under the heading "Rookwood Shapes"
(pp. 21116). There are two problems with this section. First, the
discussion of art nouveau does not directly correspond with
the other themes addressed in the chapter. Logically, this would have
fit better at the end of "Americanism and the Culture of Crisis,"
which examines Rookwood and its "Americanness" in a larger
international context. Second, Owen argues against understanding Rookwood
as part of the larger international art nouveau movement. She
relies primarily on five articles published in The Craftsman
between 1902 and 1905 to argue that American critics understood art
nouveau as a European style associated with natural forms and
whiplash curves. Although these articles do indeed suggest this, more
recent scholarship, by authors such as Diane Chalmers Johnson, Gabriel
P. Weisberg, and Jeremy Howard, illustrates that while American critics
may not have identified it as such, American artists and architects
were producing work that should be categorized as art nouveau.1 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Interestingly, in chapter
five, Owen states that while Rookwood was proud of its Americanness,
its innovations in the ceramics were celebrated throughout the world.
Rookwood received numerous prizes and awards at international exhibitions,
culminating in the Grand Prize at the 1900 Paris Exposition Universelle.
Collectors, artists, and art schools now looked to Rookwood as a model
of a "new art": one that broke with historical models and
created pieces that were innovative and original. In this chapter,
Owen's sources and conclusions firmly establish Rookwood as a firm
actively involved in producing art nouveau. Indeed, the terms that
she associates with the "typical American pottery" (that
is, Rookwood)"individuality and originality"are precisely
those characteristics that defined art nouveau as an international
movement (p. 155). |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
An apparent reversal
of contradictions is revealed in a section at the end of chapter five.
After successfully situating Rookwood in an international context
in terms of critical reception, international exhibitions, and Japonisme,
Owen examines a particular product line that contributed to Rookwood's
"Americanness," namely its Native American portraits. These
portraits were painted on ceramic vessels and featured at all major
international exhibitions from 1893 to 1904 (p. 130). Owen's research
is resourceful and informative, but the section is out of place at
the end of this chapter and its inclusion hardly furthers the thesis
advanced in this chapter. The valuable information would be better
presented as an independent article. As suggested above, Owen's discussion
of art nouveau would make a better conclusion to this chapter
and reinforce her overall thesis. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Despite these problems
in argumentation, this book is still a key text for historians in
many disciplines. Owen has effectively described how women, culture,
and commerce interacted within the United States in the late nineteenth
and early twentieth centuries. Moreover, her research on Rookwood
Pottery has brought to light much information on the company that
will lead to a greater understanding, not only of the day-to-day workings
of the company, but also of its role in the American Art Pottery movement.
Few scholars have delved this deeply into Rookwood's business practices
and policies as Owen, and her research reveals not only how its objects
were created, but for whom and why.2 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Elizabeth Fowler
Doctoral Candidate in Art History
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
1. See Diane Chalmers Johnson, American Art Nouveau (New
York: Harry N. Abrams, 1979); Gabriel P. Weisberg, Art Nouveau
Bing: Paris Style 1900 (New York: Harry N. Abrams, in association
with the Smithsonian Institution Traveling Exhibition Service, 1986);
and Jeremy Howard, Art Nouveau: National and International Styles
(New York: Manchester University Press, 1996); Gabriel P. Weisberg
and Elizabeth K. Menon, Art Nouveau: A Research Guide for Design
Reform in France, Belgium, England, and the United States (New
York: Garland Publishing, 1998).
2. For other sources on Rookwood Pottery, see Anita Ellis's exhibition
catalogue, Rookwood Pottery: The Glorious Gamble (New York:
Rizzoli, 1992); Anita Ellis, Rookwood Pottery: The Glaze Lines
(Atglen, Pennsylvania: Schiffer Publishing Co., 1995); as well as
Kenneth P. Trapp, Ode to Nature: Flowers and Landscapes of the
Rookwood Pottery, 18801940 (New York: The Jordan-Volpe Gallery,
1980). The standard reference books for Rookwood Pottery are Herbert
Peck, Book of Rookwood Pottery (New York: Crown Publishers,
1968); Herbert Peck, Second Book of Rookwood Pottery (published
by the author, 1985); and Virginia R. Cummins, Rookwood Pottery
Potpourri (Cincinnati: Cincinnati Art Galleries, 1991).
|
|
|
 |
|